[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Bas Nossing updated CXF-6597:
-----------------------------
    Description: 
A recent bugreport (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6473 to be exact) 
was fixed in CXF version 3.0.6
However, when we tried to update our WildFly to version 8.2.1 to incorporate 
this bugfix we ran into a new issue: http://pastebin.com/ezewT9Mw
It seems CXF version 3.0.6 introduces an issue with WS-Policy parsing that no 
longer allows the following definition:

{code:xml}
<wsp:Policy wsu:Id="X509EndpointPolicy">
        <wsp:ExactlyOne>

        ...

                <sp:AlgorithmSuite>
                                <wsp:Policy>
                                                <sp:Basic128Rsa15/>
                                                <sp:Basic256Rsa15/>
                                                <sp:TripleDesRsa15/>
                                </wsp:Policy>
                </sp:AlgorithmSuite>

        ...

        </wsp:ExactlyOne>
</wsp:Policy>
{code}

(excerpt from WSDL http://pastebin.com/BSMais7F and accompanying XSD 
http://pastebin.com/DRXc0Tfa)

However, according to W3C (http://www.w3.org/Submission/WS-Policy/) this is a 
perfectly valid definition.
Removing two of the key-transport-algorithms (leaving one remaining algorithm) 
from our definition makes the invalid policy exception disappear.


  was:
A recent bugreport (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6473 to be exact) 
was fixed in CXF version 3.0.6
However, when we tried to update our WildFly to version 8.2.1 to incorporate 
this bugfix we ran into a new issue: http://pastebin.com/ezewT9Mw
It seems CXF version 3.0.6 introduces an issue with WS-Policy parsing that no 
longer allows the following definition:

{{
<wsp:Policy wsu:Id="X509EndpointPolicy">
        <wsp:ExactlyOne>

        ...

                <sp:AlgorithmSuite>
                                <wsp:Policy>
                                                <sp:Basic128Rsa15/>
                                                <sp:Basic256Rsa15/>
                                                <sp:TripleDesRsa15/>
                                </wsp:Policy>
                </sp:AlgorithmSuite>

        ...

        </wsp:ExactlyOne>
</wsp:Policy>
}}

(excerpt from WSDL http://pastebin.com/BSMais7F and accompanying XSD 
http://pastebin.com/DRXc0Tfa)

However, according to W3C (http://www.w3.org/Submission/WS-Policy/) this is a 
perfectly valid definition.
Removing two of the key-transport-algorithms (leaving one remaining algorithm) 
from our definition makes the invalid policy exception disappear.



> Invalid Policy Exception on valid on WS-Policy
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CXF-6597
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6597
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: JAX-WS Runtime
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.6
>         Environment: WildFly 8.2.1.Final
>            Reporter: Bas Nossing
>
> A recent bugreport (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6473 to be 
> exact) was fixed in CXF version 3.0.6
> However, when we tried to update our WildFly to version 8.2.1 to incorporate 
> this bugfix we ran into a new issue: http://pastebin.com/ezewT9Mw
> It seems CXF version 3.0.6 introduces an issue with WS-Policy parsing that no 
> longer allows the following definition:
> {code:xml}
> <wsp:Policy wsu:Id="X509EndpointPolicy">
>       <wsp:ExactlyOne>
>       ...
>               <sp:AlgorithmSuite>
>                               <wsp:Policy>
>                                               <sp:Basic128Rsa15/>
>                                               <sp:Basic256Rsa15/>
>                                               <sp:TripleDesRsa15/>
>                               </wsp:Policy>
>               </sp:AlgorithmSuite>
>       ...
>       </wsp:ExactlyOne>
> </wsp:Policy>
> {code}
> (excerpt from WSDL http://pastebin.com/BSMais7F and accompanying XSD 
> http://pastebin.com/DRXc0Tfa)
> However, according to W3C (http://www.w3.org/Submission/WS-Policy/) this is a 
> perfectly valid definition.
> Removing two of the key-transport-algorithms (leaving one remaining 
> algorithm) from our definition makes the invalid policy exception disappear.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to