[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-7058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15490858#comment-15490858
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on CXF-7058:
-------------------------------------

GitHub user elrodro83 opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/169

    [CXF-7058] Extra CDATA elements added on long CDATA payload

    * Allow passing woodstox config to bypass the issue

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/elrodro83/cxf CXF-7058

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/169.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #169
    
----
commit 0588dcfa3c8f744c921b4e55feea10810fa1dca0
Author: Rodrigo Merino <[email protected]>
Date:   2016-09-14T16:22:27Z

    [CXF-7058] Extra CDATA elements added on long CDATA payload
    * Allow passing woodstox config to bypass the issue

----


> Extra CDATA elements added on long CDATA payload
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CXF-7058
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-7058
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Core
>    Affects Versions: 2.7.18, 3.1.7
>         Environment: All
>            Reporter: Rodrigo Merino
>         Attachments: headerSoapReqLongCdata.xml
>
>
> When calling StaxUtils.copy() with a source xml that contains a long CDATA 
> section, that long CDATA is sent in chunks to the writer, with each chunk 
> being wrapped in a CDATA independently.
> For instance, {code}<![CDATA[a..z]]>{code} in the source ends in the 
> destination as {code}<![CDATA[a.]]><![CDATA[.z]]>{code}
> This can be verified by running the test 
> org.apache.cxf.staxutils.StaxUtilsTest.testCopy() with the attached xml file 
> (headerSoapReqLongCdata.xml).
> I reported this initially to woodstox 
> (https://github.com/FasterXML/woodstox/issues/21 and 
> https://github.com/FasterXML/woodstox/issues/22),, but from Tatu's last 
> answer 
> (https://github.com/FasterXML/woodstox/issues/22#issuecomment-246254486) is 
> is something that should be handled in CXF's StaxUtils.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to