Guillaume Nodet commented on CXF-7060:

One possibility would be to use the 1.3 namespace.  I don't think we need to 
use any new feature from 1.4, so that should be fine.  The benefit is that 
support for the 1.3 namespace has been added back into 2.4.3 and 3.0.4.
We may want to keep commands separated though.

Another option would be to use an xslt to generate the 1.0 version of the 
features.xml from the 1.3 version.

> Provide Karaf 4 specific features and commands
> ----------------------------------------------
>                 Key: CXF-7060
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-7060
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: OSGi
>            Reporter: Guillaume Nodet
>            Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
>             Fix For: 3.2.0
> There are a few shortcomings when using the existing features in Karaf 4.x.
> Creating specific features and commands will allow:
>   * to not depend on blueprint
>   * to validate the feature definitions correctly
>   * fix existing features 
> In addition some features have a strong dependency on jetty, while Karaf 4.1 
> will provide a choice for the http / war provider (jetty, tomcat, undertow), 
> so it would make sense to refactor some features to better leverage those 
> possibilities.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

Reply via email to