[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Colm O hEigeartaigh closed CXF-6527.
------------------------------------

> WSDLRefValidator reject valid target reference URI/IRI
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CXF-6527
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6527
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Tooling
>            Reporter: Romain Chantereau
>            Assignee: Akitoshi Yoshida
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 3.1.3, 2.7.18, 3.0.7
>
>
> When a target namespace have “:” in the path part of the URI, the validator 
> reject the WSDL.
> This is due to this piece of code at line 137 of 
> {{tools/validator/src/main/java/org/apache/cxf/tools/validator/internal/WSDLRefValidator.java}}
>  file.
> {code:java}
> private void checkTargetNamespace(String path) {
>      try {
>         if (new URL(path).getPath().indexOf(":") != -1) {
>             throw new ToolException(": is not a valid char in the 
> targetNamespace");
>         }
>    } catch (MalformedURLException e) {
>         // do nothing
>    }
> }
> {code}
> I checked the following specifications:
> * [XML namespace|http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-names/]
> * [URI|http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3986.txt]
> * [IRI|http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3987.txt]
> * [WSDL 2.0 Target 
> namespace|http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20/#Description_targetnamespace_attribute]
> * [WSDL service definition|http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl#_service]
> and nothing forbids having a target namespace like the following one:
> {{http://host:port/part/part/resource:resource}}
> Then the validator add an extra constraint on the WSDL format without any 
> explanation.
> I looked into the source history, this validation is here since a long period 
> (before going to git), then I was not able to find out the reason behind this 
> explicit check.
> Could fix this bug or explain why there is a such limitation?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to