[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Colm O hEigeartaigh closed CXF-6369.
------------------------------------

> org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.impl.ConfigurationImpl does not comply with SPEC
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CXF-6369
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6369
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: JAX-RS
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.3, 3.0.4, 2.7.15
>            Reporter: iris ding
>            Assignee: Sergey Beryozkin
>             Fix For: 3.1.0, 3.0.5
>
>
> According to 
> http://docs.oracle.com/javaee/7/api/javax/ws/rs/core/Configurable.html
> As a general rule, for each JAX-RS component class there can be at most one 
> registration — class-based or instance-based — configured at any given 
> moment. Implementations MUST reject any attempts to configure a new 
> registration for a provider class that has been already registered in the 
> given configurable context earlier. Implementations SHOULD also raise a 
> warning to inform the user about the rejected component registration.
> For example:
>  config.register(GzipInterceptor.class, WriterInterceptor.class);
>  config.register(GzipInterceptor.class);       // Rejected by runtime.
>  config.register(new GzipInterceptor());       // Rejected by runtime.
>  config.register(GzipInterceptor.class, 6500); // Rejected by runtime.
> So we need to check whether the same class's instances have already been put 
> into config before hand.
> Also to check whether the class/instance has been registered via  public 
> boolean isRegistered(Class<?> cls) , we need to check whether the two class 
> is the same other than just isAssignableFrom.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to