[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-7160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15768899#comment-15768899
 ] 

Freeman Fang commented on CXF-7160:
-----------------------------------

Hi Sergey,

Yes, CXF-7179 covered this one, I will resolve this one.

And about Jetty9 support, for CXF 3.1.x branch, IMHO an extra http-jetty9 
module is too much, how about we change the jetty server version with
{code}
Server.getVersion().startsWith("9")
{code}
and using reflect way to construct the connector? We already use this way for 
specific jetty version(like we upgrade to handle jetty8 before)

About CXF 3.2 support jetty 9 only, I'm all for this as Jetty8 was EOL at end 
of 2014 and no further work on jetty 8 so CXF 3.2 support jetty 9 only make a 
lot sense for me. I will send mail to the dev to start discussion.

Best Regards
Freeman

> Can not configure CXF http-jetty transport to handle X-Fowarded-for headers 
> with Jetty 9
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CXF-7160
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-7160
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Transports
>    Affects Versions: 3.1.5
>            Reporter: Joe Luo
>            Assignee: Freeman Fang
>
> With Jetty 8, we can configure CXF http-jetty transport to handle reverse 
> proxy headers by simply setting "forwarded" to "true" to Jetty8 NIO 
> SelectChannelConnector:
> {code}
> <httpj:engine-factory bus="cxf">
>     <httpj:engine port="${crx.ws.port}">
>           <httpj:connector>
>                   <bean id="connector" 
> class="org.eclipse.jetty.server.nio.SelectChannelConnector">                  
>   
>                           <property name="port" value="${crx.ws.port}" />     
>                
>                               <property name="forwarded" value="true" />      
>           
>                       </bean>            
>               </httpj:connector>          
>       </httpj:engine> 
> </httpj:engine-factory>
> {code}
> However, with Jetty 9, it is not possible to do so. Because in Jetty 9, the 
> SelectChannelConnector was replaced by more generic purpose ServerConnector. 
> And we can't configure ServerConnector since the old no-args constructor does 
> not exist anymore in ServerConnector class and all new constructors require 
> the org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server as an input parameter.
> Jetty 9 documentation here talked about "X-Forward-for Configuration":
> http://www.eclipse.org/jetty/documentation/9.4.x/configuring-connectors.html
> We should configure HttpConfiguration with ForwardedRequestCustomizer in 
> order to handle reverse proxy headers:
> {code}
> <New id="httpConfig" class="org.eclipse.jetty.server.HttpConfiguration">
>     <Set name="outputBufferSize">32768</Set>
>     <Set name="requestHeaderSize">8192</Set>
>     <Set name="responseHeaderSize">8192</Set>
>     <Call name="addCustomizer">
>         <Arg>
>             <New class="org.eclipse.jetty.server.ForwardedRequestCustomizer"/>
>         </Arg>
>     </Call>
> </New>
> {code}
> However, CXF http-jetty transport schema is not in-sync with API changes in 
> Jetty 9. There is no way to configure above with CXF http-jetty transport 
> schema.
> I can think of two solutions:
> # Just like what we did in another JIRA:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-5937 for servlet, we should also 
> fix CXF http-jetty transport so we can optionally react to X-Forwarded 
> headers;
> # Change CXF http-jetty transport schema
> http://cxf.apache.org/schemas/configuration/http-jetty.xsd
> and related java code to allow configuring HttpConfiguration along with 
> ForwardedRequestCustomizer in order to handle X-Fowarded-for headers.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to