[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-7246?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15864994#comment-15864994
]
Dhawal commented on CXF-7246:
-----------------------------
Hi Sergey,
I have few possible fixes in mind, mentioned below..
1. Write a custom ThreadPoolExecutor which will override the beforeExecute()
method in which we can copy and pass on the Message object to child threads and
register this custom ThreadPoolExecutor in xml for parallel processing.
2. Change Message object in PhaseInterceptorChain from ThreadLocal to
InheritableThreadLocal this automatically pass on the current threads Message
object to child threads, but the problem with this approach is that we cannot
use Fixed thread pool executors because the object from parent to child threads
are only passed during thread creation alone, so for subsequent requests/jobs
we might end using older Message object belonging to older request/job
3. Combined approach of #1 and #2 - This is currently the best approach i see,
which will be able to cater all the possible scenarios I can think of right
now. Where we can manage inter-thread message passing.
I will fix and test the same. Please let me know if you think of any corner
case which we might miss.
Thanks,
Dhawal Patel
> PhaseInterceptorChain's Message is not passed to child threads.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CXF-7246
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-7246
> Project: CXF
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: JAX-RS
> Affects Versions: 2.6.14
> Reporter: Dhawal
>
> Hello,
> We put few information(usually request header information) in Message through
> RequestHandler by doing
> PhaseInterceptorChain.getCurrentMessage.getExchange.put("","");
> But when we create a new Threads from the thread which brings in request to
> the controller, those objects which are put in the Exchange are not available
> to new threads. The PhaseInterceptorChain has Message object which is
> ThreadLocal so the objects are not available to subsequent threads which are
> created, so exploiting parallelism is quite painful once we store something
> in Exchange object.
> As a suggestion can we have Message object as optional between ThreadLocal
> and InheritableThreadLocal and via a configuration we can set that do we need
> to make available Message object to child threads.
> Thanks,
> Dhawal Patel
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
