[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-5754?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15875203#comment-15875203
]
Augusto Sellhorn commented on CXF-5754:
---------------------------------------
Yes, still an issue in CXF 3.0.4 and 3.0.5
I have a test that will make calls to a server with a component that processes
calls that timeout, you can see the memory increase over a 4 hour period and
make the VM get an OOM error.
!memory-leak-due-to-timeouts-4hrs.png!
When you do an analysis on the Eclipse Memory Analyzer, it detects the leak in
JMSConduit
!eclipse-mem-analyzer.png!
The top objects stored in memory turn out to be HashMap related
(java.util.HashMap$Node)
> JMSConduit - temporary queue not beeing closed if relpyMessage is null
> (timeout)
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CXF-5754
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-5754
> Project: CXF
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: WS-* Components
> Affects Versions: 2.7.11
> Reporter: Philipp Hahn
> Attachments: eclipse-mem-analyzer.png,
> memory-leak-due-to-timeouts-4hrs.png
>
>
> Our implementation:
> CXF 2.7.11
> JMS Queue on TIBCO
> We have the problem, that if a timeout is raised the temporary queue is not
> been deleted.
> After code review of the JmsConduit class we have seen, that in case of a
> timeout, cxf is only raises only an RuntimeException (JmsConduit line 256)
> {code}
> javax.jms.Message replyMessage =
> jmsTemplate.receiveSelected(replyToDestination, messageSelector);
> if (replyMessage == null) {
> throw new RuntimeException("Timeout receiving message
> with correlationId " + correlationId);
> } else {
> doReplyMessage(exchange, replyMessage);
> }
> {code}
> Is this the problem why the temporary queue is not been closed in case of a
> timeout? Is there an solution for this problem?
> Thanks!
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
