[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DOSGI-267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16085138#comment-16085138
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on DOSGI-267:
--------------------------------------
GitHub user badfish69 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cxf-dosgi/pull/3
[DOSGI-267] Treat all intents annotated with @Provider as providers
Currently a static list of classes is used to determine if a given intent
is treated as a provider. This patch allows any class with the @Provider
annotation to be treated as one.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/badfish69/cxf-dosgi DOSGI-267
Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:
https://github.com/apache/cxf-dosgi/pull/3.patch
To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:
This closes #3
----
commit bf243bd129d1191c9ba325d5a163d3d29707461f
Author: Richard Begg <[email protected]>
Date: 2017-07-13T03:38:20Z
[DOSGI-267] Treat all intents annotated with @Provider as providers
----
> ContainerRequestFilter intents do not get registered as providers
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DOSGI-267
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DOSGI-267
> Project: CXF Distributed OSGi
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: provider-rs
> Affects Versions: 2.1.0, 2.2.0
> Reporter: Richard Begg
> Assignee: Christian Schneider
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.3.0
>
> Attachments: use_provider_annotation.patch
>
>
> Intents of ContainerRequestFilter (or ContainerResponseFilter) type do not
> automatically get registered as JAX-RS providers in the same way as
> MessageBodyReader or other provider types.
> This is due to a hard-coded list of classes in the isProvider() method in
> provider-rs/src/main/java/org/apache/cxf/dosgi/dsw/handlers/rest/RsProvider.java
> Now we could just add the filter classes to the list, but I'm wondering why
> we don't just look for the @Provider annotation instead? That way, it should
> work for everything (assuming people correctly annotate their provider
> classes).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
