[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-7899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16685972#comment-16685972
]
Freeman Fang commented on CXF-7899:
-----------------------------------
I don't think this can be done in CXF.
javax.activation:javax.activation-api:1.2.0 is the api
while
com.sun.activation:javax.activation:1.2.0 is the impl
Any runtime should have dependency for the impl if need it.
Though don't know why the impl just embed api rather than depend on it, but
this isn't something can be done in CXF IMHO
> Java 11 and javax.activation dependencies
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: CXF-7899
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-7899
> Project: CXF
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Tim Allison
> Assignee: Freeman Fang
> Priority: Major
>
> Again, many apologies if this is a duplicate. Over on TIKA-2778, we're
> trying to add only the minimal dependencies that will allow us to compile and
> run with Java 11.
> We tried adding
> {noformat}
> <!-- for java 10 -->
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.glassfish.jaxb</groupId>
> <artifactId>jaxb-runtime</artifactId>
> <version>2.3.1</version>
> </dependency>
> {noformat}
> However, as [~HansBrende] pointed out, this includes some of the
> javax.activation classes, but not those in com.sun.activation.*
> Any chance you'd be willing to migrate away from classes in this namespace?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
