[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-7904?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16693597#comment-16693597
 ] 

varun singhal commented on CXF-7904:
------------------------------------

one more thing as a workaround i modified the incoming SOAP rq to include a 
bogus <messageId> tag, sadly it doesn't work :(

*Bean Config file :* 

{{<jaxws:endpoint>}}

{{<jaxws:inInterceptors>}}

{{<bean id="inTransformInterceptor"}}
{{ class="org.apache.cxf.interceptor.transform.TransformInInterceptor">}}
{{ <constructor-arg type="java.lang.String"}}
{{ value="receive" />}}
{{ <property name="inAppendElements">}}
{{ <map>}}
{{ <!-- insert a unspecified wsa:MessageID -->}}
{{ <entry}}
{{ key="\{http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/}Header/"}}
{{ 
value="\{http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/08/addressing}MessageID=http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/unspecified";
 />}}
{{ </map>}}
{{ </property>}}
{{ </bean> }}
{{ </jaxws:inInterceptors>}}
{{ </jaxws:endpoint>}}

 I am still getting the error, any clue in regards to this ?

> [Migrating to CXF 3.2.7] : Receving "A required header representing a Message 
> Addressing Property is not present" during SOAP RQ processing
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CXF-7904
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-7904
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 3.2.7
>            Reporter: varun singhal
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: Logs.txt
>
>
> Hello team,
> Greetings :)
> *Context :* 
>  Migration of webservice from CXF 2.2.2 to CXF 3.2.7
> *Problem :* 
>  CXF is throwing "A required header representing a Message Addressing 
> Property is not present" while processing the below RQ :
> *SOAP RQ :*
>  <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
>  <soap:Envelope 
>  xmlns:wsa="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/08/addressing"; 
>  
> xmlns:wsu="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurityutility-1.0.xsd";
>  
>  xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"; 
>  xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; 
>  
> xmlns:wsse="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-secext-1.0.xsd";
>  
>  xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";>
>  <soap:Header>
>  <wsse:Security soap:mustUnderstand="1">
>  <wsse:UsernameToken wsu:Id="">
>  <wsse:Username>sampleUser</wsse:Username>
>  <wsse:Password>samplePassword</wsse:Password>
>  <wsse:PartnerID>samplePartner</wsse:PartnerID>
>  </wsse:UsernameToken>
>  </wsse:Security>
>  <wsa:To>[https://samplewebservice.com/samplews]</wsa:To>
>  <wsa:Action>[https://samplewebservice.com/samplews/htng]</wsa:Action>
>  <wsa:From>
>  
> <wsa:Address>[http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/08/addressing/role/anonymous]</wsa:Address>
>  <wsa:Reference/>
>  </wsa:From>
>  </soap:Header>
>  <soap:Body>
> ......
>  </soap:Body>
>  </soap:Envelope>
> Th exception thrown is
> *Exception* :
>  {{10:40:34,475 WARNING [org.apache.cxf.phase.PhaseInterceptorChain] 
> (http-127.0.0.1:8080-1) Interceptor for \{webservice URL}invoke has thrown 
> exception, unwinding now: org.apache.cxf.binding.soap.SoapFault: 
> {color:#ff0000}A required header representing a Message Addressing Property 
> is not present {color}}}
>  Logs attached.[^Logs.txt]
> *Root cause :* 
>  The root cause of this issue is that _<wsa:MessageID>_ is missing in SOAP 
> header, after inserting it, the RQ is processed successfully.
> *Question :* 
>  The wsa specs ([https://www.w3.org/Submission/ws-addressing/]) advise that 
> _<wsa:MessageID>_ is mandatory only when _<wsa:ReplyTo>_ or _<wsa:FaultTo>_ 
> is present
>  In the above RQ there is no _<wsa:ReplyTo>_ or _<wsa:FaultTo>_ thus 
> _<wsa:MessageID>_ should be optional, then could you advise why CXF is 
> validating it as mandatory and throwing exception in SOAP RQ processing ?
> Surprisingly, *the very same request works in CXF 2.2.2*
>  If this is correct behaviour then can you please suggest a workaround as it 
> will be very diffcult to ask all consumers of our webservice to start sending 
> this tag.
> Many thanks for your kind help !



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to