[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17058126#comment-17058126
]
Sergius Mohr commented on CXF-8240:
-----------------------------------
Thanks. Without workarounds i receive this error:
{code:xml}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<soap11:Envelope
xmlns:wsse="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-secext-1.0.xsd"
xmlns:soap11="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
<soap11:Body>
<soap11:Fault>
<faultcode>soap11:Client</faultcode>
<faultstring>Client Error</faultstring>
<detail>
<istserror:Error
xmlns:istserror="http://www.tgic.de/intern/itc/ISTSError/1.1">
<Details Code="3009">
<Type>soap11:Client</Type>
<Reason>Der Sender verwendet ein ungueltiges
Nachrichtenschema</Reason>
<Detail>WSDL-Konformitaetspruefung der eingehenden Nachricht
fehlgeschlagen: http://exttest-ists-v2.tgic.de:80/RST/Issue: cvc-particle 3.1:
in element
{http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200512}RequestSecurityToken of type
{http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200512}RequestSecurityTokenType,
found <wst:RequestType> (in namespace
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200512), but next item should be
{http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200512}TokenType</Detail>
</Details>
<SupportInfo
ReferenceId="ists-core-v2-93d045a4-c2a2-4a71-b456-27e71e106add">
<Instance>BB-SG-ETU-01</Instance>
<SessionId>4622fdd8-f289-43f4-b84a-27e71e10043c</SessionId>
<Timestamp>2020-03-12T17:11:14Z</Timestamp>
</SupportInfo>
</istserror:Error>
</detail>
</soap11:Fault>
</soap11:Body>
</soap11:Envelope>
{code}
I believe, this provider made some changes on XSDs:
{code:xml}
<!--
Tailored for ISTS
=================
- IssueRequestRST
- CancelRequestRST
- ValidateRequestRST
-->
<xs:complexType name="IssueRequestRST">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="RequestSecurityToken" type="ists:tIssueRequestRST" />
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
<!-- ISTS-specific types and enumerations for WS-Trust 1.3 -->
<xsd:complexType name='tIssueRequestRST' >
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element ref='wst:TokenType' />
<xsd:element ref='wst:RequestType' />
<xsd:element ref='wsp:AppliesTo' />
<xsd:element ref='wst:Claims' />
<xsd:element ref='wst:Lifetime' minOccurs='0' />
<xsd:element ref='wst:AuthenticationType' minOccurs='0' />
</xsd:sequence>
<xsd:attribute name='Context' type='xsd:anyURI' use='optional' />
</xsd:complexType>
{code}
"sequence" made the order mandatory.
> STSClient produces wrong element order for TokenType (issue, renew)
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CXF-8240
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8240
> Project: CXF
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: STS
> Affects Versions: 3.3.5
> Reporter: Sergius Mohr
> Assignee: Colm O hEigeartaigh
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: sts-client
> Fix For: 3.4.0, 3.3.6
>
>
> Scenario: using STSClient to call a STS server via SOAP. Creating issue
> request according to WS-Trust spec.
> I have read the WS-Trust sepcs from 1.0 to 1.4 and the elements under
> RequestSecurityToken should be in this order: TokenType, RequestType, etc.
> see spec:
> [http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/v1.4/errata01/os/ws-trust-1.4-errata01-os-complete.html#_Toc325658937]
> {code:xml}
> <wst:RequestSecurityToken Context="..." xmlns:wst="...">
> <wst:TokenType>...</wst:TokenType>
> <wst:RequestType>...</wst:RequestType>
> ...
> </wst:RequestSecurityToken>
> {code}
> STSClient produces in most cases this element order:
> {code:xml}
> <wst:RequestSecurityToken Context="..." xmlns:wst="...">
> <wst:RequestType>...</wst:RequestType>
> <wst:TokenType>...</wst:TokenType>
> ...
> </wst:RequestSecurityToken>
> {code}
>
> This produces a schema invalid request and is rejected by servers (like MS
> ADFS or IBM DataPower).
>
> One Workaround is to override the addRequestType:
> {code:java}
> @Override
> protected void addRequestType(String requestType, W3CDOMStreamWriter writer)
> throws XMLStreamException {
> //correction of the element order: TokenType first and then the
> RequestType
> addTokenType(writer);
> setTokenType(null);
> super.addRequestType(requestType, writer);
> }
> {code}
> Another Workaround is to set the "template" to STSClient (no documentation
> found to this, i used OpenSAML3 code for this):
> {code:java}
> MarshallerFactory marshallerFactory =
> XMLObjectProviderRegistrySupport.getMarshallerFactory();
> RequestSecurityToken requestSecurityTokenObject = new
> RequestSecurityTokenBuilder().buildObject();
> TokenType tokenType = new TokenTypeBuilder().buildObject();
> marshallerFactory.registerMarshaller(TokenType.ELEMENT_NAME, new
> TokenTypeMarshaller());
> requestSecurityTokenObject.getUnknownXMLObjects().add(tokenType);
> tokenType.setValue("http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/oasis-wss-saml-token-profile-1.1#SAMLV2.0");
> stsClient.setTemplate(new
> RequestSecurityTokenMarshaller().marshall(requestSecurityTokenObject));
> {code}
> It's not better.
>
> Please fix this by moving the calling of addTokenType() method in
> AbstractSTSClient (in issue() and renew()) to before the addRequestType().
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)