[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-2517?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14377053#comment-14377053
 ] 

Adam Gilmore commented on DRILL-2517:
-------------------------------------

That makes sense - I didn't feel right about changing the immutable nature of 
it.

I understand the point about it being an optimizer rule and shouldn't change 
the query output, but it does make it concerning that we can't avoid 
directories explicitly.  For example, if I wanted to have queries occurring on 
a directory while a new Parquet file was being created in a subdirectory, it'd 
start erroring.

Partition "pruning" in the table name sounds good, but I couldn't do the 
equivalent of "WHERE dir0 IN (1, 4, 9, 12)" using that, I imagine.

Can you think of another way this could be accomplished?

> Partition pruning still reading files during planning
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DRILL-2517
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-2517
>             Project: Apache Drill
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Query Planning & Optimization
>    Affects Versions: 0.7.0, 0.8.0
>            Reporter: Adam Gilmore
>            Assignee: Aman Sinha
>
> Partition pruning still tries to read Parquet files during the planning stage 
> even though they don't match the partition filter.
> For example, if there were an invalid Parquet file in a directory that should 
> not be queried:
> {code}
> 0: jdbc:drill:zk=local> select sum(price) from dfs.tmp.purchases where dir0 = 
> 1;
> Query failed: IllegalArgumentException: file:/tmp/purchases/4/0_0_0.parquet 
> is not a Parquet file (too small)
> {code}
> The reason is that the partition pruning happens after the Parquet plugin 
> tries to read the footer of each file.
> Ideally, partition pruning would happen first before the format plugin gets 
> involved.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to