[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-3281?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Deneche A. Hakim updated DRILL-3281:
------------------------------------
    Description: 
Computing a MAX or MIN of a TIME column using the OVER clause seem to generate 
wrong results compared to Postgres. Example of such queries:
{noformat}
SELECT MIN(CAST(columns[1] AS TIME)) OVER(PARTITION BY columns[0]) FROM 
`3281.csv`;
{noformat}
{noformat}
SELECT MAX(CAST(columns[1] AS TIME)) OVER(PARTITION BY columns[0]) FROM 
`3281.csv`; {noformat}


  was:
Computing a MAX or MIN of a TIME column using the OVER clause seem to generate 
wrong results compared to Postgres. Example of such queries:
{noformat}
SELECT MIN(cast( columns[8] as TIME )) OVER(PARTITION BY cast( columns[2] as 
CHAR(2)) ORDER BY cast( columns[0] as INT )) FROM `allData.csv`;
{noformat}
SELECT MAX(cast( columns[8] as TIME )) OVER(PARTITION BY cast( columns[2] as 
CHAR(2)) ORDER BY cast( columns[0] as INT )) FROM `allData.csv`;
{noformat}

{noformat}



> window functions that involve TIME columns generate wrong results
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DRILL-3281
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-3281
>             Project: Apache Drill
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Execution - Flow
>            Reporter: Deneche A. Hakim
>            Assignee: Deneche A. Hakim
>             Fix For: 1.1.0
>
>         Attachments: 3281.csv
>
>
> Computing a MAX or MIN of a TIME column using the OVER clause seem to 
> generate wrong results compared to Postgres. Example of such queries:
> {noformat}
> SELECT MIN(CAST(columns[1] AS TIME)) OVER(PARTITION BY columns[0]) FROM 
> `3281.csv`;
> {noformat}
> {noformat}
> SELECT MAX(CAST(columns[1] AS TIME)) OVER(PARTITION BY columns[0]) FROM 
> `3281.csv`; {noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to