[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-3524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Hari Sekhon updated DRILL-3524:
-------------------------------
    Description: 
Request to add full DESCRIBE support for MongoDB collections.

I understand this may be difficult / sub-optimal due to the flexible schema 
nature of Mongo docs but if you can tabulate results when reading directly from 
MongoDB for which you have read the field names, then it's also possible to 
extract all field names to present for the describe command, albeit an 
inefficient scan to do so.

Currently describe returns a pseudo / inaccurate / unhelpful metadata:
{code}+--------------+------------+--------------+
| COLUMN_NAME  | DATA_TYPE  | IS_NULLABLE  |
+--------------+------------+--------------+
| *            | ANY        | YES          |
+--------------+------------+--------------+{code}

Perhaps you could extend DESCRIBE to scan the first few dozen docs by default 
to create a merged schema as well as adding an optional argument to the 
describe command to allow for scanning a user-specified number of docs from 
which to describe the schema, or an ALL argument keyword to describe to scan 
all docs in a collection to get the complete global schema for the collection?

In case of schema evolution it might be an interesting option to additionally 
read the first and last records by ID etc.

  was:
Request to add full DESCRIBE support for MongoDB collections.

I understand this may be difficult / sub-optimal due to the flexible schema 
nature of Mongo docs but if you can tabulate results when reading directly from 
MongoDB for which you have read the field names, then it's also possible to 
extract all field names to present for the describe command, albeit an 
inefficient scan to do so.

Currently describe returns a pseudo / inaccurate / unhelpful metadata:
{code}+--------------+------------+--------------+
| COLUMN_NAME  | DATA_TYPE  | IS_NULLABLE  |
+--------------+------------+--------------+
| *            | ANY        | YES          |
+--------------+------------+--------------+{code}

Perhaps you could extend DESCRIBE to scan the first few dozen docs by default 
to create a merged schema as well as adding an optional argument to the 
describe command to allow for scanning a user-specified number of docs from 
which to describe the schema, or an ALL argument keyword to describe to scan 
all docs in a collection to get the complete global schema for the collection?


> Drill proper DESCRIBE support for MongoDB
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DRILL-3524
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-3524
>             Project: Apache Drill
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Metadata, Storage - MongoDB
>    Affects Versions: 1.1.0
>            Reporter: Hari Sekhon
>            Assignee: Steven Phillips
>
> Request to add full DESCRIBE support for MongoDB collections.
> I understand this may be difficult / sub-optimal due to the flexible schema 
> nature of Mongo docs but if you can tabulate results when reading directly 
> from MongoDB for which you have read the field names, then it's also possible 
> to extract all field names to present for the describe command, albeit an 
> inefficient scan to do so.
> Currently describe returns a pseudo / inaccurate / unhelpful metadata:
> {code}+--------------+------------+--------------+
> | COLUMN_NAME  | DATA_TYPE  | IS_NULLABLE  |
> +--------------+------------+--------------+
> | *            | ANY        | YES          |
> +--------------+------------+--------------+{code}
> Perhaps you could extend DESCRIBE to scan the first few dozen docs by default 
> to create a merged schema as well as adding an optional argument to the 
> describe command to allow for scanning a user-specified number of docs from 
> which to describe the schema, or an ALL argument keyword to describe to scan 
> all docs in a collection to get the complete global schema for the collection?
> In case of schema evolution it might be an interesting option to additionally 
> read the first and last records by ID etc.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to