[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-3634?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Rahul Challapalli updated DRILL-3634:
-------------------------------------
    Description: 
The hive scan portion of the text plan only lists the files scanned. It would 
be helpful if the text plan also had fileCount value or the number of 
partitions scanned.

Reason : Currently as part of our tests we are verifying plans using a regex 
based verification and the expected regex is matching more than it should. 
Fixing this might be hard. So if we have the fileCount/partitionCount as part 
of the plan, the plan comparision will be more accurate

  was:
The hive scan portion of the text plan only lists the files scanned. It would 
be helpful if the text plan also had fileCount value.

Reason : Currently as part of our tests we are verifying plans using a regex 
based verification and the expected regex is matching more than it should. 
Fixing this might be hard. So if we have the fileCount as part of the plan, the 
plan comparision will be more accurate


> Hive Scan : Add fileCount (no of files scanned) or no of partitions scanned 
> to the text plan
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DRILL-3634
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-3634
>             Project: Apache Drill
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Storage - Hive
>    Affects Versions: 1.2.0
>            Reporter: Rahul Challapalli
>             Fix For: Future
>
>
> The hive scan portion of the text plan only lists the files scanned. It would 
> be helpful if the text plan also had fileCount value or the number of 
> partitions scanned.
> Reason : Currently as part of our tests we are verifying plans using a regex 
> based verification and the expected regex is matching more than it should. 
> Fixing this might be hard. So if we have the fileCount/partitionCount as part 
> of the plan, the plan comparision will be more accurate



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to