[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15241497#comment-15241497
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on DRILL-4539:
---------------------------------------
Github user amansinha100 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/462#issuecomment-210047513
Right, the HashJoin and MergeJoin currently can handle one type of
comparison, not mixed...this is why when we have a join condition such as
t1.a1 = t2.a2 AND t2.b1 < t2.b2 then Drill planner currently will split it up
into equality join and the non-equality conditions. The equality is handled by
the join operator while a new Filter node is added after the join to process
the non-equality. I had created a JIRA to be able to handle both types of
comparisons in the join operator: see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-3803. Do you need this support
for this particular null equality join issue ? I would have thought that your
rewrite rule would produce the IS NOT DISTINCT FROM condition, but not a mixed
condition.
> Add support for Null Equality Joins
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: DRILL-4539
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4539
> Project: Apache Drill
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Jacques Nadeau
> Assignee: Venki Korukanti
>
> Tableau frequently generates queries similar to this:
> {code}
> SELECT `t0`.`city` AS `city`,
> `t2`.`X_measure__B` AS `max_Calculation_DFIDBHHAIIECCJFDAG_ok`,
> `t0`.`state` AS `state`,
> `t0`.`sum_stars_ok` AS `sum_stars_ok`
> FROM (
> SELECT `business`.`city` AS `city`,
> `business`.`state` AS `state`,
> SUM(`business`.`stars`) AS `sum_stars_ok`
> FROM `mongo.academic`.`business` `business`
> GROUP BY `business`.`city`,
> `business`.`state`
> ) `t0`
> INNER JOIN (
> SELECT MAX(`t1`.`X_measure__A`) AS `X_measure__B`,
> `t1`.`city` AS `city`,
> `t1`.`state` AS `state`
> FROM (
> SELECT `business`.`city` AS `city`,
> `business`.`state` AS `state`,
> `business`.`business_id` AS `business_id`,
> SUM(`business`.`stars`) AS `X_measure__A`
> FROM `mongo.academic`.`business` `business`
> GROUP BY `business`.`city`,
> `business`.`state`,
> `business`.`business_id`
> ) `t1`
> GROUP BY `t1`.`city`,
> `t1`.`state`
> ) `t2` ON (((`t0`.`city` = `t2`.`city`) OR ((`t0`.`city` IS NULL) AND
> (`t2`.`city` IS NULL))) AND ((`t0`.`state` = `t2`.`state`) OR ((`t0`.`state`
> IS NULL) AND (`t2`.`state` IS NULL))))
> {code}
> If you look at the join condition, you'll note that the join condition is an
> equality condition which also allows null=null. We should add a planning
> rewrite rule and execution join option to allow null equality so that we
> don't treat this as a cartesian join.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
