[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4852?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15426582#comment-15426582
]
Zelaine Fong edited comment on DRILL-4852 at 8/18/16 2:59 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------------
[~khfaraaz] - you indicated you thought this might be a regression from
DRILL-4479. Have you been able to confirm that?
was (Author: zfong):
[~khfaraaz] - you inidcated you thought this might be a regression from
DRILL-4479. Have you been able to confirm that?
> COUNT(*) query over 26M rows slower by 2x on mapr drill 1.8.0
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DRILL-4852
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4852
> Project: Apache Drill
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Execution - Flow
> Affects Versions: 1.8.0
> Environment: 4 node cluster CentOS
> Reporter: Khurram Faraaz
> Priority: Critical
>
> We have this manual test where it does a COUNT over 26 million JSON keys.
> From the results it looks like we have regressed and are slower by 2x on
> current 1.8.0 master 1.8.0-SNAPSHOT git commit ID : 57dc9f43
> Query takes over 30 seconds to execute consistently over several runs. Note
> that since this is a single large JSON file there is just one fragment doing
> all the work.
> {noformat}
> 0: jdbc:drill:schema=dfs.tmp> select count(*) from `twoKeyJsn.json`;
> +-----------+
> | EXPR$0 |
> +-----------+
> | 26212355 |
> +-----------+
> 1 row selected (29.001 seconds)
> {noformat}
> On Drill 1.2.0 the above query took 13.949 seconds
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
