[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4452?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15569779#comment-15569779
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on DRILL-4452:
---------------------------------------

Github user vkorukanti commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/395#discussion_r83089376
  
    --- Diff: exec/jdbc/pom.xml ---
    @@ -21,9 +21,9 @@
     
       <dependencies>
         <dependency>
    -      <groupId>net.hydromatic</groupId>
    -      <artifactId>optiq-avatica</artifactId>
    -      <version>0.9-drill-r20</version>
    +      <groupId>org.apache.calcite</groupId>
    +      <artifactId>calcite-avatica</artifactId>
    +      <version>1.4.0-drill-r10</version>
    --- End diff --
    
    Can we use refactor the version into root pom and use the same version both 
in jdbc and exec/java-exec?


> Update avatica version for Drill jdbc
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DRILL-4452
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4452
>             Project: Apache Drill
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Client - JDBC
>    Affects Versions: 1.5.0
>            Reporter: Laurent Goujon
>            Assignee: Laurent Goujon
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Drill depends on a very old version of Avatica (0.9.0/pre-calcite), which 
> makes integrating changes harder and harder. 
> Although Avatica has evolved to support a custom protocol, with a server 
> stub, I believe it is still possible for Drill to use the client part as the 
> JDBC facade, with small adjustments.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to