[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4452?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15569779#comment-15569779
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on DRILL-4452:
---------------------------------------
Github user vkorukanti commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/395#discussion_r83089376
--- Diff: exec/jdbc/pom.xml ---
@@ -21,9 +21,9 @@
<dependencies>
<dependency>
- <groupId>net.hydromatic</groupId>
- <artifactId>optiq-avatica</artifactId>
- <version>0.9-drill-r20</version>
+ <groupId>org.apache.calcite</groupId>
+ <artifactId>calcite-avatica</artifactId>
+ <version>1.4.0-drill-r10</version>
--- End diff --
Can we use refactor the version into root pom and use the same version both
in jdbc and exec/java-exec?
> Update avatica version for Drill jdbc
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: DRILL-4452
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4452
> Project: Apache Drill
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Client - JDBC
> Affects Versions: 1.5.0
> Reporter: Laurent Goujon
> Assignee: Laurent Goujon
> Priority: Minor
>
> Drill depends on a very old version of Avatica (0.9.0/pre-calcite), which
> makes integrating changes harder and harder.
> Although Avatica has evolved to support a custom protocol, with a server
> stub, I believe it is still possible for Drill to use the client part as the
> JDBC facade, with small adjustments.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
