[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-5109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Nitin updated DRILL-5109:
-------------------------
    Description: 
Following query when executed,
0: jdbc:drill:zk=local> create table dfs.tmp.`/tmp/t` as select 
cast(employee_id as double) employee_id, cast(department_id as double) 
department_id,cast(salary as double) salary,DENSE_RANK( ) over( partition by 
cast(department_id as double)  order by cast(salary as double) asc  nulls first 
 )  dummy_DENSE_RANK from cp.`employee.json`;

0: jdbc:drill:zk=local> select * from dfs.tmp.`/tmp/t` limit 5;
+------+------+----------+-----+
|  $0  |  $1  |    $2    | $3  |
+------+------+----------+-----+
| 1.0  | 1.0  | 80000.0  | 4   |
| 2.0  | 1.0  | 40000.0  | 3   |
| 4.0  | 1.0  | 40000.0  | 3   |
| 5.0  | 1.0  | 35000.0  | 2   |
| 6.0  | 2.0  | 25000.0  | 4   |
+------+------+----------+-----+i

t should have had the proper column names. even from parquet schema it comes as 
bash-3.2$ java -jar parquet-tools-1.6.0rc4.jar schema /tmp/tmp/t/0_0_0.parquet 
message root { 
     optional double $0;  
     optional double $1; 
     optional double $2;  
      required int64 $3;
}
But when we add order by clause in query it is adding column names looks like 
an issue with storage writer. This is true for all cases whichever file format 
we choose to store as for CTAS

  was:
Following query when executed,
0: jdbc:drill:zk=local> create table dfs.tmp.`/tmp/t` as select 
cast(employee_id as double) employee_id, cast(department_id as double) 
department_id,cast(salary as double) salary,DENSE_RANK( ) over( partition by 
cast(department_id as double)  order by cast(salary as double) asc  nulls first 
 )  dummy_DENSE_RANK from cp.`employee.json`;

0: jdbc:drill:zk=local> select * from dfs.tmp.`/tmp/t` limit 5;
+------+------+----------+-----+
|  $0  |  $1  |    $2    | $3  |+
------+------+----------+-----+
| 1.0  | 1.0  | 80000.0  | 4   |
| 2.0  | 1.0  | 40000.0  | 3   |
| 4.0  | 1.0  | 40000.0  | 3   |
| 5.0  | 1.0  | 35000.0  | 2   |
| 6.0  | 2.0  | 25000.0  | 4   |
+------+------+----------+-----+i

t should have had the proper column names. even from parquet schema it comes as 
bash-3.2$ java -jar parquet-tools-1.6.0rc4.jar schema /tmp/tmp/t/0_0_0.parquet 
message root { 
     optional double $0;  
     optional double $1; 
     optional double $2;  
      required int64 $3;
}
But when we add order by clause in query it is adding column names looks like 
an issue with storage writer. This is true for all cases whichever file format 
we choose to store as for CTAS


> CTAS queries for window functions creating files without column names
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DRILL-5109
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-5109
>             Project: Apache Drill
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Functions - Drill, Storage - Writer
>    Affects Versions: 1.8.0, 1.9.0
>            Reporter: Nitin
>
> Following query when executed,
> 0: jdbc:drill:zk=local> create table dfs.tmp.`/tmp/t` as select 
> cast(employee_id as double) employee_id, cast(department_id as double) 
> department_id,cast(salary as double) salary,DENSE_RANK( ) over( partition by 
> cast(department_id as double)  order by cast(salary as double) asc  nulls 
> first  )  dummy_DENSE_RANK from cp.`employee.json`;
> 0: jdbc:drill:zk=local> select * from dfs.tmp.`/tmp/t` limit 5;
> +------+------+----------+-----+
> |  $0  |  $1  |    $2    | $3  |
> +------+------+----------+-----+
> | 1.0  | 1.0  | 80000.0  | 4   |
> | 2.0  | 1.0  | 40000.0  | 3   |
> | 4.0  | 1.0  | 40000.0  | 3   |
> | 5.0  | 1.0  | 35000.0  | 2   |
> | 6.0  | 2.0  | 25000.0  | 4   |
> +------+------+----------+-----+i
> t should have had the proper column names. even from parquet schema it comes 
> as 
> bash-3.2$ java -jar parquet-tools-1.6.0rc4.jar schema 
> /tmp/tmp/t/0_0_0.parquet 
> message root { 
>      optional double $0;  
>      optional double $1; 
>      optional double $2;  
>       required int64 $3;
> }
> But when we add order by clause in query it is adding column names looks like 
> an issue with storage writer. This is true for all cases whichever file 
> format we choose to store as for CTAS



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to