[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-5459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16008799#comment-16008799
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on DRILL-5459:
---------------------------------------
Github user jinfengni commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/823#discussion_r116333318
--- Diff:
exec/java-exec/src/test/java/org/apache/drill/exec/physical/unit/MiniPlanUnitTestBase.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,439 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ * <p/>
+ * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ * <p/>
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+package org.apache.drill.exec.physical.unit;
+
+import com.google.common.base.Preconditions;
+import com.google.common.collect.Lists;
+import mockit.NonStrictExpectations;
+import org.apache.drill.DrillTestWrapper;
+import org.apache.drill.common.expression.SchemaPath;
+import org.apache.drill.exec.physical.base.PhysicalOperator;
+import org.apache.drill.exec.physical.impl.BatchCreator;
+import org.apache.drill.exec.physical.impl.ScanBatch;
+import org.apache.drill.exec.record.BatchSchema;
+import org.apache.drill.exec.record.MaterializedField;
+import org.apache.drill.exec.record.RecordBatch;
+import org.apache.drill.exec.record.VectorAccessible;
+import org.apache.drill.exec.rpc.NamedThreadFactory;
+import org.apache.drill.exec.store.RecordReader;
+import org.apache.drill.exec.store.dfs.DrillFileSystem;
+import
org.apache.drill.exec.store.parquet.ParquetDirectByteBufferAllocator;
+import org.apache.drill.exec.store.parquet.ParquetReaderUtility;
+import
org.apache.drill.exec.store.parquet.columnreaders.ParquetRecordReader;
+import org.apache.drill.exec.util.TestUtilities;
+import org.apache.hadoop.fs.Path;
+import org.apache.parquet.hadoop.CodecFactory;
+import org.apache.parquet.hadoop.ParquetFileReader;
+import org.apache.parquet.hadoop.metadata.ParquetMetadata;
+
+import java.util.ArrayList;
+import java.util.Collections;
+import java.util.HashMap;
+import java.util.Iterator;
+import java.util.List;
+import java.util.Map;
+import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService;
+import java.util.concurrent.Executors;
+
+import static org.apache.drill.exec.physical.unit.TestMiniPlan.fs;
+
+/**
+ * A MiniPlanUnitTestBase extends PhysicalOpUnitTestBase, to construct
MiniPlan (aka plan fragment).
+ * in the form of physical operator tree, and verify both the expected
schema and output row results.
+ * Steps to construct a unit:
+ * 1. Call PopBuilder / ScanPopBuilder to construct the MiniPlan
+ * 2. Create a MiniPlanTestBuilder, and specify the expected schema and
base line values, or if there
+ * is no batch expected.
+ */
+
+public class MiniPlanUnitTestBase extends PhysicalOpUnitTestBase {
--- End diff --
Thanks for the suggestion. I'll leave it as future improvement, as it
requires refactor the new class as well as the existing physical operator test
framework.
> Extend physical operator test framework to test mini plans consisting of
> multiple operators
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DRILL-5459
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-5459
> Project: Apache Drill
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Tools, Build & Test
> Reporter: Jinfeng Ni
> Assignee: Jinfeng Ni
> Labels: ready-to-commit
>
> DRILL-4437 introduced a unit test framework to test a non-scan physical
> operator. A JSON reader is implicitly used to specify the inputs to the
> physical operator under test.
> There are needs to extend such unit test framework for two scenarios.
> 1. We need a way to test scan operator with different record readers. Drill
> supports a variety of data source, and it's important to make sure every
> record reader work properly according to the protocol defined.
> 2. We need a way to test a so-called mini-plan (aka plan fragment) consisting
> of multiple non-scan operators.
> For the 2nd need, an alternative is to leverage SQL statement and query
> planner. However, such approach has a direct dependency on query planner; 1)
> any planner change may impact the testcase and lead to a different plan, 2)
> it's not always easy job to force the planner to get a desired plan fragment
> for testing.
> In particular, it would be good to have a relatively easy way to specify a
> mini-plan with a couple of targeted physical operators.
> This JIRA is created to track the work to extend the unit test framework in
> DRILL-4437.
>
> Related work: DRILL-5318 introduced a sub-operator test fixture, which mainly
> targeted to test at sub-operator level. The framework in DRILL-4437 and the
> extension would focus on operator level, or multiple operator levels, where
> execution would go through RecordBatch's API call.
> Same as DRILL-4437, we are going to use mockit to mock required objects such
> fragment context, operator context etc.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
