[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-5716?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16157066#comment-16157066
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on DRILL-5716:
---------------------------------------
Github user ppadma commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/928#discussion_r137541831
--- Diff: exec/java-exec/src/main/resources/drill-module.conf ---
@@ -344,6 +357,20 @@ drill.exec: {
# Full workspace name should be indicated (including schema and
workspace separated by dot).
# Workspace MUST be file-based and writable. Workspace name is
case-sensitive.
default_temporary_workspace: "dfs.tmp"
+
+ // Resource management
+ rm : {
+ // Memory per node normally comes from the direct memory alloated on
the JVM
+ // command line. This parameter, if other than 0, further limits the
amount.
+ // Primarily for testing.
+ memory_per_node: 0,
+ // The number of available CPUs normally comes directly from the
system itself.
+ // This parameter, if other than 0, further limits the number of CPUs
will
+ // will consider when planning. Note that, sadly, this parameter does
not
+ // limit *actual* CPU usage; only the amount of CPU assumed to exist
when
+ // planning and managing queries. Primarily for testing.
+ cpus_per_node: 0,
+ }
--- End diff --
ok. Thanks for the clarification.
> Queue-based memory assignment for buffering operators
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DRILL-5716
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-5716
> Project: Apache Drill
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 1.12.0
> Reporter: Paul Rogers
> Assignee: Paul Rogers
>
> Apache Drill already has a queueing feature based on ZK semaphores. We did a
> bit of testing to show that the feature does, in fact work. We propose to
> enhance the feature with some light revisions to make work with the "managed"
> external sort and the newly-added spilling feature for the hash agg operator.
> The key requirement is to build on what we have for now; we may want to
> tackle a larger project to create a more complete solution later.
> Existing functionality:
> * Two ZK-based queues called the “small” and “large” query queues.
> * A threshold, call it T, given as a query cost, to determine the queue into
> which a query will go.
> * Admit levels for the two queues: call them Qs and Ql.
> Basically, when a query comes in:
> * Plan the query as usual.
> * Obtain the final query cost from the planner, call this C.
> * If C<T, the query goes into the small queue, else it goes into the large
> queue.
> * Suppose the small queue. Ask ZK if the query can run.
> * ZK checks if Qs queries are already running. If so, the query waits, else
> the query runs.
> The proposed changes include:
> * Refactor the code to provide a queueing API that supports a variety of
> queuing mechanisms.
> * Provide three: the null queue (default), an in-process queue (for testing)
> and the ZK queues.
> * Modify the query profile web UI to show two new bits of information about
> queues:
> - The queue to which the query was sent.
> - The total planning cost.
> * Modify the query profile web UI to show two memory assignment numbers:
> - Total memory allocated to the query
> - Memory per sort or hash-add operator
> Then, add to the queue mechanism the ability to do memory assignment:
> * Provide a weight, W: every small query gets 1 unit, every large query gets
> W units.
> * Use the queue admit levels to determine total units: U = Qs + W * Ql.
> * Obtain total direct memory from the system. M.
> * Subtract a reserve percent R for overhead.
> * Do the math to get the memory per query for each query:
> * For the small queue: (M - R) / U
> * For the large queue: (M - R) / U * W
> * Use this memory amount as the “memory per query” number in the existing
> sort/hash-agg memory assignment (instead of the fixed 2 GB.)
> The result will be a nice incremental addition to what we already have, and
> should make it a bit easier people to actually use the feature (because they
> can see the planning numbers and see the queues used, allowing them to
> effectively tune the system.)
> The API used for the above features also allow third parties to add on a more
> robust admission control feature as needed, perhaps tying into an existing
> queueing mechanism of their choice.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
