[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-5824?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16188469#comment-16188469
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on DRILL-5824:
---------------------------------------

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

    https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/966


> 1st phase Hash Aggregate allocates more memory than the limit
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DRILL-5824
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-5824
>             Project: Apache Drill
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Execution - Relational Operators
>    Affects Versions: 1.11.0
>            Reporter: Boaz Ben-Zvi
>            Assignee: Boaz Ben-Zvi
>             Fix For: 1.12.0
>
>   Original Estimate: 24h
>  Remaining Estimate: 24h
>
> The per query memory limit was set to 2G. But the 1st phase hash agg operator 
> memory limit set was larger than that:
> AGGR OOM at First Phase. Partitions: 32. Estimated batch size: 4784128. 
> values size: 3670016. Output alloc size: 3670016. Planned batches: 1 Memory 
> limit: 2680684544 so far allocated: 374341632.
> Fragment 3:0
> [Error Id: b22fe6ad-b805-433c-bae7-c0f60c30bb99 on 10.10.30.168:31010]
> (org.apache.drill.exec.exception.OutOfMemoryException) AGGR OOM at First 
> Phase. Partitions: 32. Estimated batch size: 4784128. values size: 3670016. 
> Output alloc size: 3670016. Planned batches: 1 Memory limit: 2680684544 so 
> far allocated: 374341632.
> org.apache.drill.exec.test.generated.HashAggregatorGen5265.checkGroupAndAggrValues():1350
> org.apache.drill.exec.test.generated.HashAggregatorGen5265.doWork():591
> org.apache.drill.exec.physical.impl.aggregate.HashAggBatch.innerNext():169
> org.apache.drill.exec.record.AbstractRecordBatch.next():164
> org.apache.drill.exec.record.AbstractRecordBatch.next():119
> org.apache.drill.exec.record.AbstractRecordBatch.next():109
> org.apache.drill.exec.record.AbstractSingleRecordBatch.innerNext():51
> org.apache.drill.exec.physical.impl.project.ProjectRecordBatch.innerNext():141
> org.apache.drill.exec.record.AbstractRecordBatch.next():164
> org.apache.drill.exec.physical.impl.BaseRootExec.next():105
> org.apache.drill.exec.physical.impl.SingleSenderCreator$SingleSenderRootExec.innerNext():92
> org.apache.drill.exec.physical.impl.BaseRootExec.next():95
> org.apache.drill.exec.work.fragment.FragmentExecutor$1.run():234
> org.apache.drill.exec.work.fragment.FragmentExecutor$1.run():227
> java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged():-2
> javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs():415
> org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation.doAs():1595
> org.apache.drill.exec.work.fragment.FragmentExecutor.run():227
> org.apache.drill.common.SelfCleaningRunnable.run():38
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker():1145
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run():615
> java.lang.Thread.run():745



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to