[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-5830?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16191520#comment-16191520
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on DRILL-5830:
---------------------------------------

Github user vdiravka commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/968
  
    With separate table class for MapR-DB we can follow the same approach of 
expanding column star into list as for HBase plugin. For that reason I've 
created a [PR-973 (DRILL-5775)](https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/973) for 
it.
    
    @jinfengni Please take a look at this PR as well.


> Resolve regressions to MapR DB from DRILL-5546
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DRILL-5830
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-5830
>             Project: Apache Drill
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 1.12.0
>            Reporter: Paul Rogers
>            Assignee: Paul Rogers
>             Fix For: 1.12.0
>
>
> DRILL-5546 added a number of fixes for empty batches. One part of the fix was 
> for HBase. Key changes:
> * Add code to expand wildcards in the planner. (i.e. SELECT *)
> * Remove support for wildcards in the HBase record reader.
> As noted in DRILL-5775, this change had the effect of breaking support for 
> MapR-DB binary (which is API compatible with HBase.) DRILL-5775 does this by 
> expanding wildcards in the planner for MapR DB as was done for HBase in 
> DRILL-5546.
> Unfortunately, this change introduced other regressions into the code as 
> described by DRILL-5706.
> Investigation of those issues revealed that we should back out the original 
> DRILL-5546 changes and go down a different route.
> As it turns out, HBase already had a project push-down rule that expanded 
> wildcards. However, that rule didn't work correctly some of the time. 
> DRILL-5546 fixed that bug, ensuring that wildcards are expanded (at least in 
> the cases tested for this ticket.)
> The actual issue turned out to be a bug in the {{RecordBatchLoader}} class 
> which did not consider map contents when detecting schema change. As a 
> result, results like (row_key, cf\{}) were treated the same as (row_key, 
> cf\{mycol}) and the actual data colums were discarded, but randomly depending 
> on batch arrival order.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to