[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-6242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16401470#comment-16401470
]
Kunal Khatua commented on DRILL-6242:
-------------------------------------
We might be able to go with option C.
Quoting this from http://www.joda.org/joda-time/
{quote}The standard date and time classes prior to Java SE 8 are poor. By
tackling this problem head-on, Joda-Time became the de facto standard date and
time library for Java prior to Java SE 8. *Note that from Java SE 8 onwards,
users are asked to migrate to java.time (JSR-310) - a core part of the JDK
which replaces this project.*{quote}
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm guessing that would solve your problem, as we
could move to {{java.sql.*}} formats. However, this essentially amounts to a
non-trivial amount of code refactoring.
> Output format for nested date, time, timestamp values in an object hierarchy
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DRILL-6242
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-6242
> Project: Apache Drill
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Execution - Data Types
> Affects Versions: 1.12.0
> Reporter: Jiang Wu
> Priority: Major
>
> Some storages (mapr db, mongo db, etc.) have hierarchical objects that
> contain nested fields of date, time, timestamp types. When a query returns
> these objects, the output format for the nested date, time, timestamp, are
> showing the internal object (org.joda.time.DateTime), rather than the logical
> data value.
> For example. Suppose in MongoDB, we have a single object that looks like
> this:
> {code:java}
> > db.test.findOne();
> {
> "_id" : ObjectId("5aa8487d470dd39a635a12f5"),
> "name" : "orange",
> "context" : {
> "date" : ISODate("2018-03-13T21:52:54.940Z"),
> "user" : "jack"
> }
> }
> {code}
> Then connect Drill to the above MongoDB storage, and run the following query
> within Drill:
> {code:java}
> > select t.context.`date`, t.context from test t;
> +--------+---------+
> | EXPR$0 | context |
> +--------+---------+
> | 2018-03-13 |
> {"date":{"dayOfYear":72,"year":2018,"dayOfMonth":13,"dayOfWeek":2,"era":1,"millisOfDay":78774940,"weekOfWeekyear":11,"weekyear":2018,"monthOfYear":3,"yearOfEra":2018,"yearOfCentury":18,"centuryOfEra":20,"millisOfSecond":940,"secondOfMinute":54,"secondOfDay":78774,"minuteOfHour":52,"minuteOfDay":1312,"hourOfDay":21,"zone":{"fixed":true,"id":"UTC"},"millis":1520977974940,"chronology":{"zone":{"fixed":true,"id":"UTC"}},"afterNow":false,"beforeNow":true,"equalNow":false},"user":"jack"}
> |
> {code}
> We can see that from the above output, when the date field is retrieved as a
> top level column, Drill outputs a logical date value. But when the same
> field is within an object hierarchy, Drill outputs the internal object used
> to hold the date value.
> The expected output is the same display for whether the date field is shown
> as a top level column or when it is within an object hierarchy:
> {code:java}
> > select t.context.`date`, t.context from test t;
> +--------+---------+
> | EXPR$0 | context |
> +--------+---------+
> | 2018-03-13 | {"date":"2018-03-13","user":"jack"} |
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
