[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-3353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16498294#comment-16498294
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on DRILL-3353:
---------------------------------------
ilooner commented on issue #86: DRILL-3353: Fix dropping nested fields
URL: https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/86#issuecomment-393951013
This was already merged.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
> Non data-type related schema changes errors
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DRILL-3353
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-3353
> Project: Apache Drill
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Storage - JSON
> Affects Versions: 1.0.0
> Reporter: Oscar Bernal
> Assignee: Steven Phillips
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.5.0
>
> Attachments: i-bfbc0a5c-ios-PulsarEvent-2015-06-23_19.json.zip
>
>
> I'm having trouble querying a data set with varying schema for a nested
> object fields. The majority of my data for a specific type of record has the
> following nested data:
> {code}
> "attributes":{"daysSinceInstall":0,"destination":"none","logged":"no","nth":1,"type":"organic","wearable":"no"}}
> {code}
> Among those records (hundreds of them) I have only two with a slightly
> different schema:
> {code}
> "attributes":{"adSet":"Teste-Adwords-Engagement-Branch-iOS-230615-adset","campaign":"Teste-Adwords-Engagement-Branch-iOS-230615","channel":"Adwords","daysSinceInstall":0,"destination":"none","logged":"no","nth":4,"type":"branch","wearable":"no"}}
> {code}
> When trying to query the "new" fields, my queries fail:
> With {code:sql}ALTER SYSTEM SET `store.json.all_text_mode` = true;{code}
> {noformat}
> 0: jdbc:drill:zk=local> select log.event.attributes from
> `dfs`.`root`.`/file.json` as log where log.si =
> '07A3F985-4B34-4A01-9B83-3B14548EF7BE' and log.event.attributes.ad =
> 'Teste-FB-Engagement-Puro-iOS-230615';
> Error: SYSTEM ERROR: java.lang.NumberFormatException:
> Teste-FB-Engagement-Puro-iOS-230615"
> Fragment 0:0
> [Error Id: 22d37a65-7dd0-4661-bbfc-7a50bbee9388 on
> ip-10-0-1-16.sa-east-1.compute.internal:31010] (state=,code=0)
> {noformat}
> With {code:sql}ALTER SYSTEM SET `store.json.all_text_mode` = false;`{code}
> {noformat}
> 0: jdbc:drill:zk=local> select log.event.attributes from
> `dfs`.`root`.`/file.json` as log where log.si =
> '07A3F985-4B34-4A01-9B83-3B14548EF7BE';
> Error: DATA_READ ERROR: Error parsing JSON - You tried to write a Bit type
> when you are using a ValueWriter of type NullableVarCharWriterImpl.
> File file.json
> Record 35
> Fragment 0:0
> [Error Id: 5746e3e9-48c0-44b1-8e5f-7c94e7c64d0f on
> ip-10-0-1-16.sa-east-1.compute.internal:31010] (state=,code=0)
> {noformat}
> If I try to extract all "attributes" from those events, Drill will only
> return a subset of the fields, ignoring the others.
> {noformat}
> 0: jdbc:drill:zk=local> select log.event.attributes from
> `dfs`.`root`.`/file.json` as log where log.si =
> '07A3F985-4B34-4A01-9B83-3B14548EF7BE' and log.type ='Opens App';
> +----------------------------------------------------+
> | EXPR$0 |
> +----------------------------------------------------+
> | {"logged":"no","wearable":"no","type":"xxxx"} |
> | {"logged":"no","wearable":"no","type":"xxxx"} |
> | {"logged":"no","wearable":"no","type":"xxxx"} |
> | {"logged":"no","wearable":"no","type":"xxxx"} |
> | {"logged":"no","wearable":"no","type":"xxxx"} |
> +----------------------------------------------------+
> {noformat}
> What I find strange is that I have thousands of records in the same file with
> different schema for different record types and all other queries seem run
> well.
> Is there something about how Drill infers schema that I might be missing
> here? Does it infer based on a sample % of the data and fail for records that
> were not taken into account while inferring schema? I suspect I wouldn't have
> this error if I had 100's of records with that other schema inside the file,
> but I can't find anything in the docs or code to support that hypothesis.
> Perhaps it's just a bug? Is it expected?
> Troubleshooting guide seems to mention something about this but it's very
> vague in implying Drill doesn't fully support schema changes. I thought that
> was for data type changes mostly, for which there are other well documented
> issues.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
