[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16789573#comment-16789573
]
Mua Ndzo Laurent commented on FINERACT-696:
-------------------------------------------
[~vorburger] i am interested in solving this issue. I have gone through -
[https://github.com/KengoTODA/findbugs-slf4j/] and how to include it in the
codebase. I would love to take on this as my first contributions into the org
> use SpotBugs and findbugs-slf4j to detect bad logging anti-patterns
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FINERACT-696
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-696
> Project: Apache Fineract
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Build
> Reporter: Michael Vorburger.ch
> Priority: Major
> Labels: starter
>
> While code reviewing [https://github.com/apache/fineract/pull/464], I came
> accross a {{catch}} & {{printStackTrace}}, which is of course wrong (it
> should instead be, correctly, logged, instead).
> In an ideal world, it would not take human code review to catch this, but
> just an automated build failure. This is possible using SpotBugs (not
> FindBugs anymore; SpotBugs is the new FindBugs, it's a fully compatible
> successor) and [https://github.com/KengoTODA/findbugs-slf4j/] (for this
> particular case [https://github.com/KengoTODA/findbugs-slf4j/issues/70], but
> using findbugs-slf4j for Fineract would have value even before that's
> implemented).
> [~myrle] you mentioned at FOSDEMO that you had hordes of volunteers just
> waiting to have issues to working on (I'm joking) - so I was wondering if
> perhaps you knew of anyone who would be willing to work on this one?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
