[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-764?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16863591#comment-16863591
 ] 

Michael Vorburger.ch edited comment on FINERACT-764 at 6/14/19 1:21 AM:
------------------------------------------------------------------------

> will every file in the 
> fineract-provider/src/integrationTest/java/org/apache/fineract/integrationtests/
>  need to modified ie basically adding the {{@SpringBootTest?}}

[~muarachmann] yeah, basically. So just re-add MariaDB4j but only as a 
dependency with scope test, not runtime, we don't want to bloat the final WAR 
with MariaDB4j, and move the 
fineract-provider/src/test/java/org/apache/fineract/infrastructure/core/boot/tests/AbstractSpringBootWithMariaDB4jIntegrationTest.java
 as well as that SpringBootServerLoginTest.java (remove the {{@Ignore("Failing 
on Cloubees")} please) into 
{{fineract-provider/src/integrationTest/java/org/apache/fineract/integrationtests/}}
 and make each of those tests there extends 
AbstractSpringBootWithMariaDB4jIntegrationTest - I'm curious if that will work, 
but I think it should - I don't see why it wouldn't.

Is this something you could make time and raise a PR for? For this I would just 
start a new PR, off [my latest 
#525|https://github.com/apache/fineract/pull/525], not [your 
#550|https://github.com/apache/fineract/pull/550].


was (Author: vorburger):
> will every file in the 
> fineract-provider/src/integrationTest/java/org/apache/fineract/integrationtests/
>  need to modified ie basically adding the {{@SpringBootTest?}}

[~muarachmann] yeah, basically. So just re-add MariaDB4j but only as a 
dependency with scope test, not runtime, we don't want to bloat the final WAR 
with MariaDB4j, and move the 
fineract-provider/src/test/java/org/apache/fineract/infrastructure/core/boot/tests/AbstractSpringBootWithMariaDB4jIntegrationTest.java
 as well as that SpringBootServerLoginTest.java (remove the {{@Ignore("Failing 
on Cloubees")} please) into 
{{fineract-provider/src/integrationTest/java/org/apache/fineract/integrationtests/}}
 and make each of those tests there extends 
AbstractSpringBootWithMariaDB4jIntegrationTest - I'm curious if that will work, 
but I think it should - I don't see why it wouldn't.

Is this something you could make time and raise a PR for? For this I would just 
start a new PR, off [my latest 
#525](https://github.com/apache/fineract/pull/525), not [your 
#550](https://github.com/apache/fineract/pull/550).

> Run Integration Tests using Spring Boot IT support instead of on Tomcat 
> started separately by gradle-tomcat-plugin
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FINERACT-764
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-764
>             Project: Apache Fineract
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Michael Vorburger.ch
>            Priority: Major
>
> https://github.com/apache/fineract/pull/525 for FINERACT-700 struggles to get 
> "./gradlew integrationTest" working under an up-to-date Gradle version, due 
> to the gradle-tomcat-plugin failing to start Tomcat. The problem can also be 
> seen (on that PR, as it stands right now) via {{./gradlew tomcatrunwar}}.
> https://github.com/bmuschko/gradle-tomcat-plugin mentions that its author "I 
> don't have much time to contribute anymore. In practice this means far less 
> activity, responsiveness on issues and new releases from my end."
> What we IMHO really should do instead is to ditch our use of 
> gradle-tomcat-plugin and just use Spring Boot's very nice built-in support 
> for Integration Test, see here:
> * 
> https://docs.spring.io/spring-boot/docs/2.1.5.RELEASE/reference/htmlsingle/#boot-features-testing-spring-applications
> * https://www.baeldung.com/spring-boot-testing (see 7. Integration Testing 
> with @SpringBootTest)
> * https://reflectoring.io/spring-boot-test/
> I wouldn't have time for this, but perhaps someone would like to pick this up?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to