[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17086091#comment-17086091
 ] 

Awasum Yannick commented on FINERACT-762:
-----------------------------------------

PR: [https://github.com/apache/fineract/pull/757] by [~vorburger] indirectly 
related to this issue and escapes new keywords in MySQL 8.0. 

> Use of (unmaintained) Drizzle JDBC driver in Fineract at run-time (not build) 
> is sub-optimal for performance
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FINERACT-762
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-762
>             Project: Apache Fineract
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Michael Vorburger
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: performance, technical
>          Time Spent: 40m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Creating this issue to clarify that while FINERACT-761 is focused on (only) 
> the build time use of the Drizzle JDBC driver (which does not lead to it 
> being included in the final Fineract end-user distribution), this is re. the 
> use of it at run-time, which is packaged in the distribution.
> The two uses are technically unrelated. While the use of Drizzle instead of 
> Connector/J in the build is a a blocking issue, the use at run-time is not a 
> blocking problem, currently. It's perhaps still not ideal to maintain on a 
> completely unmaintained library (Drizzle) for database access, e.g. for 
> performance.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to