[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17102649#comment-17102649
]
Michael Vorburger commented on FINERACT-944:
--------------------------------------------
A [quick JIRA search for
"notification"|https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=text%20~%20%22%2Fnotifications%22%20and%20project%3D%22Apache%20Fineract%22%20]
reveals issues such as FINERACT-527, FINERACT-582, FINERACT-691, FINERACT-293,
FINERACT-695, FINERACT-583, but glancing over those, I have a feeling that
there are a bunch of different kinds of notifications in play here?
https://mifosforge.jira.com/wiki/spaces/docs/pages/153387033/Configure+Notifications
seems to be about some kind of end-user notification feature within Fineract.
How that requires JMS is not clear at least to me.
> Missing documentation for /notifications in both README and the REST API in
> api-docs/apiLive.htm
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FINERACT-944
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-944
> Project: Apache Fineract
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Michael Vorburger
> Priority: Major
> Labels: documentation
>
> In https://github.com/apache/fineract/pull/832 for FINERACT-938, I discovered
> that Fineract, apparently, has some kind of support for Notifications
> delivered via JMS.
> This feature seems to have originally been contributed in
> https://github.com/apache/fineract/commit/c60c6601c07df7903214fcfbbb1145741fc0ef42
> (without any JIRA...), which introduced a new /notifications endpoint to the
> REST API in NotificationApiResource.
> The README does not explain how this JMS support would be used or configured,
> and the
> https://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/apache/fineract/blob/develop/api-docs/apiLive.htm
> does not seem to include any documentation about this. (BTW note that
> api-docs/apiLive.htm is about to be moved in the Git repo, see
> https://github.com/apache/fineract/pull/819 for FINERACT-910.)
> If we want to keep this functionality, it may be useful to properly document
> it? If this was more of an "experiment" (?) for which there are no known
> users, then... perhaps it should be entirely removed some time? There is n
> urgency / hurry, if works, and is useful to anyone.
> (https://github.com/apache/fineract/pull/832 just wants to remove 1 test,
> not the functionality, and this issue is really more about documenting the
> functionality than proposing to remove it.)
> [~awasum], [~angeh] or [~edcable] or anyone else reading this, do you know
> more about the background of this? Is this actually used? :P
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
