[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-897?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17103633#comment-17103633
]
Yemdjih Kaze Nasser edited comment on FINERACT-897 at 5/10/20, 4:00 AM:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
I just had a better idea. I just tested the changes I've made with mysql5 and
it still works just fine. So instead of just discarding the changes completely,
we can make it such that either mysql5 or mysql8 passes. without any problem.
It could serve future purposes if our db is already somewhat compatible with
mysql8. What do you think??
was (Author: xurror):
I just had a better idea. I just tested the changes I've made with mysql5 and
it still works just fine. So instead of just discarding the changes completely,
we can make it such that either mysql5 or mysql8 passes. without any problem.
> MySQL v8
> --------
>
> Key: FINERACT-897
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-897
> Project: Apache Fineract
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Database
> Reporter: Michael Vorburger
> Assignee: Yemdjih Kaze Nasser
> Priority: Major
> Labels: technical
>
> Test Fineract with the latest version of MySQL v8 instead of the old MySQL 5
> we currently seem to be mostly using.
> Hopefully our use of the (very old...) Drizzle JDBC driver doesn't cause any
> issues for this; if it does, note FINERACT-762.
> See also FINERACT-896.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
