[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17103769#comment-17103769
]
Michael Vorburger commented on FINERACT-967:
--------------------------------------------
I expect some of the alert here (on lgtm.com) will naturally overlap with what
will be found in FINERACT-969 - that's fine.
> lgtm.com Security Vulnerability Assessment Scanning
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FINERACT-967
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-967
> Project: Apache Fineract
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Security
> Reporter: Michael Vorburger
> Priority: Major
> Labels: technical
>
> https:///projects/g/apache/fineract/ is pretty "interesting"... ;-)
> 368 alerts: 69 Errors, 251Warnings, 48 Recommendations
> Let's do something about this? :P
> FINERACT-854 for FINERACT-853 should address some of the issues raised there.
> Let's first do that, and then look at this again. Whatever is left, we
> ideally should not just fix it "one off", but find (or make?!) automated code
> scan quality tools which detect those issues - and make sure that we don not
> re-introduce them again over time.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
