[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-830?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17113202#comment-17113202
 ] 

Michael Vorburger commented on FINERACT-830:
--------------------------------------------

Resolving, as the main goal here is now reached. [~xurror] and [~ptuomola] 
could I encourage you to open new issues more specific to Kubernetes (your 
discussion above), if any?

> Use distroless base image instead of bitnami/tomcat in container
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FINERACT-830
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-830
>             Project: Apache Fineract
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Michael Vorburger
>            Assignee: Petri Tuomola
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: kubernetes, technical
>
> Rohit Verma on the mailing list raised using a "more hardened base image like 
> distroless".
> I'll admit that I'm personally not a huge fan of "FROM bitnami/tomcat:7.0.94" 
> myself! Any contributions you'd like to make on this front would be very very 
> welcome, from my side.
> https://github.com/GoogleContainerTools/distroless is a great alternative. 
> (BTW 
> https://access.redhat.com/containers/?tab=images#/registry.access.redhat.com/redhat-openjdk-18/openjdk18-openshift
>  is a another great choice, if you're into something supported.)
> Your mission, should you choose to accept it and work on this issue, would be 
> to raise a PR modifying our Dockerfile, but then still have the related test 
> at the end of .travis.yml pass - everything (container, Docker Compose, 
> Kubernetes) should, obviously, still "work as is", even if you go for 
> changing the base image. Makes sense and sounds fair?
>  
> PS: What we really should do at some point is move away from 1990s style 
> WAR-in-Tomcat, and make java -jar fineract.war work instead (and then use 
> that in the container)... people working on this could also contribute, 
> before or after, to FINERACT-730.  (On a related front, there's also 
> FINERACT-764, but both are probably independent enough from each other to be 
> tackled separately.)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to