Michael Vorburger created FINERACT-1175:
-------------------------------------------
Summary: Fix spm.repository / spm.domain JPA bug (?), and simplify
appContext.xml
Key: FINERACT-1175
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-1175
Project: Apache Fineract
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Michael Vorburger
Assignee: Michael Vorburger
While I was working on FINERACT-1127, I've noticed that appContext.xml
individually lists 10+ packages.. why not just use org.apache.fineract.** ?
There is also a
fineract-provider/src/main/resources/META-INF/spring/spmContext.xml, which
seems weird.. why is that, and only that, in a separate file, instead of listed
in appContext.xml? Would seem more consistent to have all in one.
Most importantly, perhaps, the {{<jpa:repositories
base-package="org.apache.fineract.spm.repository"/>}} in spmContext.xml seems
inconsistent with appContext.xml.. shouldn't that be
{{org.apache.fineract.spm.domain}}, instead? Or are the other ones wrong? (And
this is another reason why having them all together in a single place seems
easier, to see differences.)
[~ptuomola] [~aleks] do you perhaps have any thoughts about this?
[~xurror] ([~kaze] ?) I'm not sure if this is something that particularly
interests you, in the context of the OpenJPA to EclipseLink migration, but I
thought I would just mention it here FYI, and on the off chance that this is
causing you any issues during that project.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
