[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-1175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Vorburger updated FINERACT-1175:
----------------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 1.5.0
> Fix spm.repository / spm.domain JPA bug (?), and simplify appContext.xml
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FINERACT-1175
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-1175
> Project: Apache Fineract
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Michael Vorburger
> Assignee: Michael Vorburger
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.5.0
>
>
> While I was working on FINERACT-1127, I've noticed that appContext.xml
> individually lists 10+ packages.. why not just use org.apache.fineract.** ?
> There is also a
> fineract-provider/src/main/resources/META-INF/spring/spmContext.xml, which
> seems weird.. why is that, and only that, in a separate file, instead of
> listed in appContext.xml? Would seem more consistent to have all in one.
> Most importantly, perhaps, the {{<jpa:repositories
> base-package="org.apache.fineract.spm.repository"/>}} in spmContext.xml seems
> inconsistent with appContext.xml.. shouldn't that be
> {{org.apache.fineract.spm.domain}}, instead? Or are the other ones wrong?
> (And this is another reason why having them all together in a single place
> seems easier, to see differences.)
> [~ptuomola] [~aleks] do you perhaps have any thoughts about this?
> [~xurror] ([~kaze] ?) I'm not sure if this is something that particularly
> interests you, in the context of the OpenJPA to EclipseLink migration, but I
> thought I would just mention it here FYI, and on the off chance that this is
> causing you any issues during that project.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
