[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-1198?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17228501#comment-17228501
]
Aleksandar Vidakovic edited comment on FINERACT-1198 at 11/9/20, 10:33 AM:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[~ptuomola] [~vorburger] Please read this here:
[https://docs.gradle.org/current/userguide/sharing_build_logic_between_subprojects.html#sec:convention_plugins_vs_cross_configuration]
As an experiment I tried to remove the described coupling between projects in
one of my day job projects. This looks actually very promising... decoupled
projects have a faster configuration phase... and I mean a lot faster (read:
shrinks from minutes to seconds). Note: the project that I tried this on has a
lot more modules than Fineract. Have to see how I can translate this back to
Fineract.
was (Author: aleks):
[~ptuomola] [~vorburger] Please read this here:
[https://docs.gradle.org/current/userguide/sharing_build_logic_between_subprojects.html#sec:convention_plugins_vs_cross_configuration]
As an experiment I tried to remove the described coupling between projects in
one of my day job projects. This looks actually very promising... decoupled
projects have a faster configuration phase... and I mean a lot faster (read:
shrinks from minutes to seconds). Have to see how I can translate this back to
Fineract.
> Gradle incremental build is broken
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: FINERACT-1198
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-1198
> Project: Apache Fineract
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Build
> Reporter: Michael Vorburger
> Priority: Blocker
>
> One of the reasons why Gradle is (supposedly) so much cooler than e.g. Maven
> is that it can be really support and support very fast "incremental" builds
> (only rebuild what has changed).
> I have the impression that doesn't really work in Fineract, and suppose
> that's not really Gradle's (core) fault, but some plugin which screws this
> up? OpenJPA Enhancer, SpotBugs... presumably they all have to "play along"
> for this to work perfectly?
> My Gradle foo isn't (nearly) good enough to know if it would be possible to
> "fix" this, and how hard this may be, but filing an issue is perhaps a start
> for getting input from people more knowledgeable about this.
> [~aleks] and/or [~ptuomola] perhaps you have ideas about this.
> [~aalmiray] as per chat during ApacheCon, not sure if this is the kind of
> thing you may enjoy helping with?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
