[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-2181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18041788#comment-18041788
]
Richard Eckart de Castilho commented on FINERACT-2181:
------------------------------------------------------
[~adamsaghy] This page https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html provides
licensing guidance to Apache Software Foundation projects. It identifies the
acceptable licenses for inclusion of third-party Open Source components in
Apache Software Foundation products.
It says: The license must meet the Open Source Definition:
https://opensource.org/definition-annotated
Liquibase itselfs says that its license is not open source:
https://www.liquibase.com/blog/liquibase-community-for-the-future-fsl
Is FSL an open source license?
No. FSL does not technically meet the definition of “open source” promulgated
by the Open Source Initiative. FSL may be referred to as a “source available”
or “fair source” license. The code remains open to view, modify, and use, but
the license restricts competing commercial use during the two-year period.
So there seems to be a conflict between ASF policy and the FSL license?
> Minor bug-fixes and enhancements of 1.12.0
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FINERACT-2181
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-2181
> Project: Apache Fineract
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Adam Saghy
> Assignee: Mihaly Dallos
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: PepperSoup
> Fix For: 1.12.1
>
>
> This issue collects all the tiny PRs which improves Fineract either by
> bug-fix or non-significant improvement. This issue gets closed with *1.12*
> release.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
