Abed Ahmed created FINERACT-2614:
------------------------------------
Summary: Refactor SavingsAccount balance validation methods :
correct semantic naming and extract shared validation logic
Key: FINERACT-2614
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-2614
Project: Apache Fineract
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Savings
Reporter: Abed Ahmed
3 methods in the SavingsAccount implement account balance validation logic with
significant overlap and inconsistent naming semantic.
Current implementations include:
* validateAccountBalanceDoesNotBecomeNegative ( 2 overloaded methods )
* validateAccountBalanceDoesNotBecomeNegativeMinimal
Although these methods suggest a strict non negative balance invariant, the
actual business logic allows controlled exceptions (force withdrawal scenario
based on configuration).
This creates a semantic mismatch between method names and actual behavior,
which may lead to incorrect assumptions during maintenance or future
development.
*Proposed direction :*Â
* Improve method naming to reflect constraints ( i suggestÂ
validateAccountBalanceConstraints instead of
validateAccountBalanceDoesNotBecomeNegative )
* Extract common validation logic
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)