[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33903?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13822963#comment-13822963
]
Alex Harui commented on FLEX-33903:
-----------------------------------
Sounds reasonable. But I think that 99% of these "functions" are there for
compile-time and code-completion (and maybe for the verifier) and the code
would be much faster if they simply went away. I was pondering that if we
didn't find a try/catch block around the coercion we should just not generate
it.
> Type coercion missing, perhaps
> ------------------------------
>
> Key: FLEX-33903
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33903
> Project: Apache Flex
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: FalconJX, FlexJS
> Environment: Mac OS X
> Reporter: Peter Ent
> Assignee: Erik de Bruin
>
> I have AS code like this (from org.apache.flex.html.staticControls.DataGrid):
> public function set dataProvider(value:Object):void
> {
> IDataGridModel(model).dataProvider = value;
> }
> Compiling into JavaScript the result looks like:
> org.apache.flex.html.staticControls.DataGrid.prototype.set_dataProvider =
> function(value) {
> IDataGridModel(this.get_model()).set_dataProvider(value);
> };
> The causes "IDataGridModel not found" runtime error. I believe IDataGridModel
> should be fully qualified (the goog.require is in the file) but perhaps that
> even would not produce the correct coercion (not sure, really).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
