[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13967865#comment-13967865
]
roucaries bastien commented on FLEX-34221:
------------------------------------------
Here debian bug
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602499
> Be distribution friendly
> ------------------------
>
> Key: FLEX-34221
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34221
> Project: Apache Flex
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: .Unspecified - Compiler
> Reporter: roucaries bastien
> Original Estimate: 672h
> Remaining Estimate: 672h
>
> Hi,
> Apache flex is not really distribution friendly particularly for debian (I
> plan to package it).
> 1. You use a monolithic build tree. It means that we should take a take it
> all approach. It slow down the packaging work and render review (by legal
> team) slow. Could be possible to have a modularized approach ? I means that
> every jar in lib/ has it own package and we could compile independantly, and
> does not need to source include them. I am mainly interested on mxmlc not
> debugger.
> 2. Could be possible then to do not use and even get source needing air/
> Adobe Flash Player Content Debugger (it seems possible I compiled mxmlc
> without it) ? It is not free and not suitable for distro.
> 3. Could be possible to use your packaged saxon/xerces/javacc/battikk and so
> on. If not could you document why and include patch from upstream (as a
> distro we could include it on your package).
> 4. Could be possible to use joola for playerglobal [1] see also tamarin
> project [2]
> Thank you very much
> Bastien
> [1]
> https://github.com/CoreMedia/jangaroo-libs/tree/master/jooflash/src/main/joo/flash
> [2] https://github.com/mozilla/shumway/issues/982
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
