Mara Cou created FLEX-34378:
-------------------------------

             Summary: mx:DateValidator allows multiple separator chars
                 Key: FLEX-34378
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34378
             Project: Apache Flex
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: Validators
    Affects Versions: Apache Flex 4.12.0
         Environment: WIN 7 64
Flash 14
            Reporter: Mara Cou
            Priority: Minor


With Adobe Flex 4.12, the following validator declaration reports no validation 
error for input string "12/////12/////2012".

With Apache Flex 4.6 this leads to a validation error, which is the correct 
behaviour.

{code}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<s:WindowedApplication xmlns:fx="http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009"; 
                                           
xmlns:s="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark" 
                                           
xmlns:mx="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/mx">
        <fx:Script>
                <![CDATA[
                        import mx.controls.Alert;
                ]]>
        </fx:Script>
        
        <fx:Declarations>
                <mx:DateValidator
                        source="{enteredDate}" 
                        property="text" 
                        inputFormat="mm/dd/yyyy"
                        wrongLengthError="The date format is not correct"
                        allowedFormatChars="/ - ."
                        trigger="{checkDate}" 
                        triggerEvent="click"
                        valid="{Alert.show('Date is valid')}"
                        invalid="{Alert.show('Date is invalid')}"/>
        </fx:Declarations>
        
        
        <mx:Text text="Enter date (mm/dd/yyyy or mm-dd-yyyy or mm dd yyyy):"/>
        <mx:TextInput y="150"
                                  id="enteredDate" />
        <mx:Button y="75"
                           label="Check Date" id="checkDate"/>
        
</s:WindowedApplication>
{code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to