[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14295031#comment-14295031
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-1419:
---------------------------------------
Github user tillrohrmann commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/339#issuecomment-71819301
With your latest changes Chesney, namely the incrementing/decrementing
logic, I think that it now makes sense again to increase the counters in the
createTmpFile method. Because otherwise the following could happen.
1. You create a new temp file but do not execute the copy process yet. The
respective counter is 1
2. You delete the same file and the delete process is immediately executed.
This would delete the file.
3. Now the copy process is started and has to transfer the file again even
though it was known at the time of deleting the file that it is still needed.
What do you think? Am I missing a point which prevents putting the
incrementing logic back into the createTmpFile method?
> DistributedCache doesn't preserver files for subsequent operations
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-1419
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1419
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 0.8, 0.9
> Reporter: Chesnay Schepler
> Assignee: Chesnay Schepler
>
> When subsequent operations want to access the same files in the DC it
> frequently happens that the files are not created for the following operation.
> This is fairly odd, since the DC is supposed to either a) preserve files when
> another operation kicks in within a certain time window, or b) just recreate
> the deleted files. Both things don't happen.
> Increasing the time window had no effect.
> I'd like to use this issue as a starting point for a more general discussion
> about the DistributedCache.
> Currently:
> 1. all files reside in a common job-specific directory
> 2. are deleted during the job.
>
> One thing that was brought up about Trait 1 is that it basically forbids
> modification of the files, concurrent access and all. Personally I'm not sure
> if this a problem. Changing it to a task-specific place solved the issue
> though.
> I'm more concerned about Trait #2. Besides the mentioned issue, the deletion
> is realized with the scheduler, which adds a lot of complexity to the current
> code. (It really is a pain to work on...)
> If we moved the deletion to the end of the job it could be done as a clean-up
> step in the TaskManager, With this we could reduce the DC to a
> cacheFile(String source) method, the delete method in the TM, and throw out
> everything else.
> Also, the current implementation implies that big files may be copied
> multiple times. This may be undesired, depending on how big the files are.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
