[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Fabian Hueske updated FLINK-1340:
---------------------------------
    Priority: Minor  (was: Major)

> Project restructure
> -------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-1340
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1340
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Java API, Scala API, Streaming
>    Affects Versions: 0.9
>            Reporter: Márton Balassi
>            Priority: Minor
>
> During a recent PR of the streaming scala api [1] arose the issue of possibly 
> changing the project structure. For the discussion it seems to me that we 
> should address this as a separate issue. Things to note:
>    * According to Stephan for the batch part, there are discussions
> to combine the "flink-core", "flink-java" projects, possibly also the 
> "flink-scala" project. We are starting to see too many interdependencies. [2]
>    * Streaming is currently under flink-addons, but we are positive that for 
> the next version we can come up with a fairly stable api if needed. We would 
> like to have it top level eventually.
>    * Minor issue to keep in mind: Developing our projects with both scala and 
> java nature seems a bit flaky at the moment at least for Eclipse. [3] 
> Proposed solutions are also there, just let us make sure to give new 
> developers a smooth experience with Flink.
> I personally like the following suggestion: [2]
> We could, in the next version, go for something like 
> - flink-core (core and batch, java & scala) 
> - flink-streaming (java & scala) 
> - flink-runtime 
> - ...
> Ufuk also +1'd this.
> [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-flink/pull/275
> [2] https://github.com/apache/incubator-flink/pull/275#issuecomment-68049822
> [3] 
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-flink-dev/201412.mbox/%3CCANC1h_tLtGeOxT-aaA5KR6V4m-Efz8fSN5yKcdX%2B7sjeTdFBEw%40mail.gmail.com%3E



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to