[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1536?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14353709#comment-14353709
 ] 

joey commented on FLINK-1536:
-----------------------------

Thank you, I will pay attention to it. Now i am try to get familiar with Flink 
and Gelly. It's really a cool project. By the way, it looks like that GSOC asks 
the candidate to submit Push Request(github) or patches before joining the 
selection procedure, is that true? Nevertheless, I am new to open source 
project and hopefully may join your project. Now, I am 2nd year PhD student in 
France, mainly do research in graph combinatorial optimization (max clique, 
clique clustering, graph partition, etc). 

> GSoC project: Graph partitioning operators for Gelly
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-1536
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1536
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Gelly, Java API
>            Reporter: Vasia Kalavri
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: graph, gsoc2015, java
>
> Smart graph partitioning can significantly improve the performance and 
> scalability of graph analysis applications. Depending on the computation 
> pattern, a graph partitioning algorithm divides the graph into (maybe 
> overlapping) subgraphs, optimizing some objective. For example, if 
> communication is performed across graph edges, one might want to minimize the 
> edges that cross from one partition to another.
> The problem of graph partitioning is a well studied problem and several 
> algorithms have been proposed in the literature. The goal of this project 
> would be to choose a few existing partitioning techniques and implement the 
> corresponding graph partitioning operators for Gelly.
> Some related literature can be found [here| 
> http://www.citeulike.org/user/vasiakalavri/tag/graph-partitioning].



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to