[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Henry Saputra updated FLINK-1704:
---------------------------------
Description:
The org.apache.flink.runtime.yarn.AbstractFlinkYarnClient and
org.apache.flink.client.AbstractFlinkYarnCluster are abstract but has not
default implementation of the methods.
The classes are also used as variable type in Clifrontend which is kind of
anti-pattern of an abstract class usages.
I would like to promote them to interface instead.
was:
The org.apache.flink.runtime.yarn.AbstractFlinkYarnClient is abstract but has
not default implementation of the methods.
It also used as variable type in Clifrontend#getClient which is kind of
anti-patter of an abstract class usages.
I would like to promote this to an interface to make it clear that it is type.
> Change AbstractFlinkYarnClient and AbstractFlinkYarnCluster from abstract to
> interface
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-1704
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1704
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Henry Saputra
> Assignee: Henry Saputra
> Priority: Minor
>
> The org.apache.flink.runtime.yarn.AbstractFlinkYarnClient and
> org.apache.flink.client.AbstractFlinkYarnCluster are abstract but has not
> default implementation of the methods.
> The classes are also used as variable type in Clifrontend which is kind of
> anti-pattern of an abstract class usages.
> I would like to promote them to interface instead.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)