[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14362837#comment-14362837
]
Ufuk Celebi commented on FLINK-1558:
------------------------------------
This should be fixed in https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/471. There was an
issue with one of the test mocks. #471 should be merged today.
> Spurious failure in PipelinedPartitionQueueTest
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-1558
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1558
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Distributed Runtime
> Affects Versions: 0.9
> Reporter: Stephan Ewen
>
> The failure is reported as
> {code}
> java.lang.AssertionError: Unexpected failure during test: null. Producer
> error: null, consumer error: null
> at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88)
> at
> org.apache.flink.runtime.io.network.partition.queue.PipelinedPartitionQueueTest.doTestConcurrentProduceConsume(PipelinedPartitionQueueTest.java:214)
> at
> org.apache.flink.runtime.io.network.partition.queue.PipelinedPartitionQueueTest.doTestConcurrentProduceConsume(PipelinedPartitionQueueTest.java:171)
> at
> org.apache.flink.runtime.io.network.partition.queue.PipelinedPartitionQueueTest.testConcurrentProduceConsume(PipelinedPartitionQueueTest.java:142)
> {code}
> The test shows the following stack trace
> {code}
> java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException
> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerGet(FutureTask.java:258)
> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.get(FutureTask.java:119)
> at
> org.apache.flink.runtime.io.network.partition.queue.PipelinedPartitionQueueTest.doTestConcurrentProduceConsume(PipelinedPartitionQueueTest.java:198)
> at
> org.apache.flink.runtime.io.network.partition.queue.PipelinedPartitionQueueTest.doTestConcurrentProduceConsume(PipelinedPartitionQueueTest.java:171)
> at
> org.apache.flink.runtime.io.network.partition.queue.PipelinedPartitionQueueTest.testConcurrentProduceConsume(PipelinedPartitionQueueTest.java:142)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
> at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:622)
> at
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
> at
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:44)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:271)
> at
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:70)
> at
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:50)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:238)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:63)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:236)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:53)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:229)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:309)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:264)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:153)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:124)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:200)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:153)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:103)
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
