[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14371564#comment-14371564
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-1679:
---------------------------------------
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/488#issuecomment-84059897
I think all changes that are in `flink-core`, `flink-java`, `flink-scala`,
`flink-streaming`, `flink-spargel` are critical. For all those changes, there
should be an additional method and the current one should be deprecated.
Other changes (Runtime, Optimizer, tests) can be made without any problem.
*NOTE:* You are also breaking the system configuration. We should change it
to use the new parameter, but we should still accept the config values of the
old parameter.
> Document how "degree of parallelism" / "parallelism" / "slots" are connected
> to each other
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-1679
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1679
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Documentation
> Affects Versions: 0.9
> Reporter: Robert Metzger
> Assignee: Maximilian Michels
> Fix For: 0.9
>
>
> I see too many users being confused about properly setting up Flink with
> respect to parallelism.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
