[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14550017#comment-14550017
]
Sebastian Schelter commented on FLINK-2026:
-------------------------------------------
Wouldn't it be best to simply ignore the call to execute() if there is no more
work to do? I as user don't want to think about all the internals to be honest.
For me its common to do add a env.execute() call at the end of my flink code.
Always having to remove that if I use a count or print call somewhere seems
tedious.
> Error message in count() only jobs
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-2026
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2026
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Core
> Reporter: Sebastian Schelter
> Assignee: Maximilian Michels
> Priority: Minor
>
> If I run a job that only calls count() on a dataset (which is a valid data
> flow IMHO), Flink executes the job but complains that no sinks are defined.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
