[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15986140#comment-15986140
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-6387:
---------------------------------------
Github user shijinkui commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3777
@StephanEwen @zentol The Flink webmonitor is netty inside. In generally,
Netty is used as a tcp transfer. For a web or API server, jetty or
Playframework maybe more suitable. Especially we must fill much gaps and holes
on web security if choose netty as web framework.
I think we should re-consider whether Netty is suitable? Current Flink UI
is hard to extend.
> Flink UI support access log
> ---------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-6387
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6387
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Webfrontend
> Reporter: shijinkui
> Assignee: shijinkui
>
> Record the use request to the access log. Append use access to the log file.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
