[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6516?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16004308#comment-16004308
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-6516:
---------------------------------------

Github user fhueske commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3860#discussion_r115683748
  
    --- Diff: 
flink-libraries/flink-table/src/test/scala/org/apache/flink/table/utils/TestFilterableTableSource.scala
 ---
    @@ -97,6 +98,15 @@ class TestFilterableTableSource(
     
       override def isFilterPushedDown: Boolean = filterPushedDown
     
    +  override def getTableStats: TableStats = {
    --- End diff --
    
    If we let the `FilterableTableSource` compute the cardinality, this 
information will be lost if the source table has valid stats registered in the 
`TableSourceTable`.


> using real row count instead of dummy row count when optimizing plan
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-6516
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6516
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Table API & SQL
>            Reporter: godfrey he
>            Assignee: godfrey he
>
> Currently, the statistic of {{TableSourceTable}} is {{UNKNOWN}} mostly, and 
> the statistic from {{ExternalCatalog}} maybe is null also. Actually, only 
> each {{TableSource}} knows its statistic exactly, especial for 
> {{FilterableTableSource}} and {{PartitionableTableSource}}. So we can add 
> {{getTableStats}} method in {{TableSource}}, and use it in TableSourceScan's 
> estimateRowCount method to get real row count.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to